UC Riverside Study Finds That LGBTQIA+ People in Congress leads to more LGBTQIA+ representation

A study by UC Riverside shows that openly LGBTQIA+ people in Congress translates to more support for LGBTQIA+ rights. This news comes amidst a sweeping campaign of discrimination of the LGBTQ+ community within all aspects of government by the Trump administration, particularly in the military and executive branch. In the past two decades, LGBTQIA+ support has risen among the general public and in the government, with court cases such as Obergefell v. Hodges and further protections against employment discrimination. The authors of this study used complex methods and data from the Human Rights Campaign to determine that LGBTQIA+ members of Congress do, in fact, vote for their own interests in supporting LGBTQIA+ rights.

In my opinion, I think representation is generally a good thing and that more people voting in favor of LGBTQIA+ rights will always be welcomed. I don’t know why it took a whole study to get to that conclusion, but it’s nice to have some reinforcement. I think that there are probably more LGBTQ members of Congress than we know of, but the ever present homophobia that lingers in American society hangs over all of us, which brings me to say that I disagree with this article in some areas, particularly with the claim that LGBTQIA+ support has risen in the past two decades. While I can recognize the importance of discrimination protections and Obergefell, I don’t think that support for the LGBTQIA+ has risen by a noticeable amount since the year 2000, especially with the Trump administration’s latest actions.


Signing off,


Lily




Citations:


Mashiyama, Susan T. “Representation Translates into More Support for LGBT Rights .” University of California, Riverside, 16 Sept. 2025, news.ucr.edu/articles/2025/09/16/representation-translates-more-support-lgbt-rights.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mental health of LGBT adults is worsening, shows a UCLA study

A recent study conducted by UCLA found that transgender and bisexual adults are more likely to report serious thoughts of suicide and mental health issues, compared to their cisgender and heterosexual counterparts. The study found that these individuals are three times more likely to seriously think about suicide (48% vs. 17%) than their straight counterparts, as well. The highest level of mental health issues were among transgender people, followed by cisgender lesbians and bisexual females, then cisgender men who identify as gay or bisexual. Along with this, thoughts of suicide are highest among younger LGBTQIA+ adults (ages 18-24 and 25-34). Despite these statistics, it seems that many of these people do not receive the care they need, with 81% of LGBT adults who need mental health care not seeing a mental health practitioner or primary care physician for their issues.  One important thing to note is that this study was conducted in the state of California, known for its large L...
Read more

Supreme Court appears ready to legalize conversion therapy

(makeup for week of 10/06) The Supreme Court appears poised to uphold conversion therapy as a legal practice, as a Christian counselor in Colorado argued that a state law that fines institutions that implement the practice is against the 1st Amendment. Many key liberal figures such as Colorado Solicitor General Shannon Stevenson and Colorado Governor Jared Polis condemn the practice as they claim that it’s well within the state’s rights to prohibit a healthcare practice it deems ineffective and archaic, and that conversion therapy as a practice should be illegal, as it is in the state of Colorado. Many conservative figures, such as chief justice John Roberts, oppose these claims, stating that the practices of conversion therapists fall under free speech, and that “a patient who seeks to "end or lessen" their same-sex attraction” should be able to do so. To put it simply, I am terrified. Conversion therapy, which was once widely condemned across the nation, may now be making a...
Read more

Supreme Court declines to review legality of same-sex marriage

In recent news, the Supreme Court has declined to review its landmark decision to protect same-sex marriages (Obergefell v. Hodges), upholding gay rights in a surprising turn of events given the current state of this current administration. Former clerk Kim Davis challenged the ruling after she declined to give a marriage license to a same-sex couple and was found in contempt of court and fined $360,000, along with losing her clerk re-election. Davis challenged the ruling on the basis of religious discrimination, stating that “If ever there was a case of exceptional importance, the first individual in the Republic's history who was jailed for following her religious convictions regarding the historic definition of marriage, this should be it.” She is not alone in her sentiments, as many other key figures such as Justice Clarence Thomas have espoused anti-LGBTQ views and called into question the legality of gay rights. Despite all this, gay marriage would still have some protections...
Read more